...

Consulting

Manufactured Home Foundation Letters vs. Old Decks & Stairs: What Really Affects Your Loan?

During a recent inspection on a manufactured home, I took the opportunity to document two very common conditions I see during foundation certifications: This situation comes up all the time—especially with homes that are 10–30+ years old. The big question homeowners ask is: “If my deck or stairs are old or not built to today’s code, will that ruin my loan or foundation letter?” The Short Answer Not automatically.But it depends on how the structure relates to the manufactured home and how it’s addressed. What a Manufactured Home Foundation Letter Actually Covers A manufactured home foundation letter (HUD Permanent Foundation Certification) is focused on one thing: 👉 Whether the manufactured home itself is properly supported, anchored, and performing as a permanent foundation system per HUD requirements. This includes: It does not automatically certify: Those items are considered on-site structures, not part of the HUD foundation system. The purpose of the foundation letter is not to certify every structure on the property. The manufactured home’s primary structural support and permanent foundation system are not negatively affected by accessory structures such as decks, stairs, or porches. So What Happens If the Deck or Stairs Are in Poor Condition? Here’s how lenders typically view it: Case 1: Deck/Stairs Are Independent If the deck or stairs: Then: This is very common for secondary exits, rear stairs, or older add-ons. Case 2: Deck/Stairs Are Structurally Attached If the deck or stairs: Then: Will This Kill a Refinance or Purchase Loan? Usually, no—but it can delay it if handled poorly. Problems arise when: A properly written engineering letter: This approach protects: How I Handle This in My Foundation Letters When I encounter aging or sub-standard stairs or decks, I typically: This keeps the letter: And most importantly—it keeps loans moving. Any visible safety-related conditions observed during the site visit are communicated to the owner for maintenance or repair consideration and are documented separately from the manufactured home foundation certification scope. Bottom Line for Homeowners If you’re refinancing, selling, or purchasing a manufactured home and the lender is asking for a foundation letter, the goal is clarity—not perfection. Need a Manufactured Home Foundation Letter? We provide HUD-compliant manufactured home foundation letters nationwide, written specifically for mortgage, refinance, and underwriting use. The purpose of this evaluation is to determine whether the manufactured home’s primary foundation and anchorage system is structurally adequate and whether the presence or condition of accessory structures adversely affects the performance of the manufactured home foundation system. 👉 Learn more or request a letter here:https://oasisengineering.com/manufactured-home-foundation-letter/

Manufactured Home Foundation Letters vs. Old Decks & Stairs: What Really Affects Your Loan? Read More »

The 5.7 Sq. Ft. Myth: Florida Egress Window Requirements Clarified (FBC R310)

The 5.7 Sq. Ft. Myth: Florida Egress Window Requirements Clarified (FBC R310) It’s a panic-inducing scenario common in Florida renovations: The new impact windows have arrived, or perhaps they are already installed, and your contractor or building inspector drops a bombshell: “This bedroom window is too small. It doesn’t meet the 5.7 square foot egress requirement.” Before you panic and order a larger, more expensive custom window, you need to know the actual rules. There is a widespread misconception in the industry that every sleeping room window must meet the 5.7 sq. ft. rule. According to the Florida Building Code (FBC) Section R310, that is often incorrect. If you are dealing with a bedroom on the ground floor, the rules change in your favor. Here is an engineering breakdown of the most misunderstood rule in residential window replacements. The Rule vs. The Exception (FBC R310.2.1) The Florida Building Code dictates that every sleeping room must have at least one operable emergency escape and rescue opening (egress window). This ensures occupants can escape, and firefighters with bulky gear can enter, during a fire. The confusion stems from FBC Residential Section R310.2.1, which contains two distinct standards based on the location of the room. The General Rule (Second Story and Above) For bedrooms located on the second floor, third floor, or higher, the Net Clear Opening must be at least 5.7 square feet. Why 5.7? This size accommodates a firefighter entering through the window from a ladder. The Grade-Floor Exception (Ground Floor) If the bedroom is on the “grade-floor” (ground level), the code grants an exception. Because firefighters have easier access from the ground without a ladder, the requirement is lowered. For ground-floor bedrooms, the minimum Net Clear Opening is only 5.0 square feet. That differential of 0.7 sq. ft. (roughly 100 square inches) is massive when dealing with standard window sizes. The “Gotcha”: It’s Not About Frame Size The second biggest mistake homeowners and even some professionals make is confusing the window’s frame dimensions or the glass size (daylight opening) with the Net Clear Opening. The code doesn’t care how big the window unit is; it cares about the actual hole created when you open the window fully. Measuring Horizontal Rollers Impact horizontal roller windows are notorious for failing egress calculations because their heavy-duty frames and interlocks eat up valuable space. When you slide a horizontal roller open, you cannot just measure half the width. You must measure from the edge of the jamb to the center interlock stile that remains in the middle of the window. You lose several inches of “clear width” right there. A Real-World Case Study: The Window That Barely Passed We recently analyzed a project where a contractor flagged a ground-floor horizontal roller window as non-compliant because it didn’t meet the 5.7 sq. ft. standard. The window unit’s frame size was roughly 53″ x 38″. On paper, it looked too small to many installers. However, when we demanded the exact, on-site measurements of the clear opening (the actual open space when slid fully open), the numbers told a different story: We ran the math against the ground-floor requirement: 22.81 x 32.25 = 735.6 sq. inches To convert square inches to square feet, divide by 144: 735.6 / 144 =5.11 sq. ft. The Verdict: Because this window was on the ground floor, the requirement was only 5.0 sq. ft. The window passed by a mere 0.11 sq. ft. (about 15 square inches). If this window had been on the second floor, it would have failed. But by knowing the code exception and measuring precisely, the project was saved from a costly revision. Beyond Egress: Don’t Forget Energy Code While egress is vital for safety, it is only half the battle in Florida compliance. When selecting windows, the U-factor, SHGC (Solar Heat Gain Coefficient), and glazing specs are critical for passing energy calculations, but egress is where projects often get red-tagged during final inspection because it involves physical measurements on-site. Ensure your engineering team is looking at both the thermal performance for Florida’s rigorous energy code and the physical dimensions for life safety. Summary Checklist for Florida Egress Before ordering windows for a bedroom renovation, verify these three things simultaneously: Note: You must meet all three. For example, a window that is 20″ wide x 24″ high only equals 3.3 sq. ft., so it would fail, even though it meets the minimum width and height dimensions.

The 5.7 Sq. Ft. Myth: Florida Egress Window Requirements Clarified (FBC R310) Read More »

After-the-Fact Foundation Certification for Existing Metal Building

📘 Case Study Project Type:Residential accessory metal building (storage / garage use, non-habitable) Jurisdiction:Florida (2023 Florida Building Code) Project Background:The metal building structure had been properly permitted and inspected; however, the existing concrete slab foundation had been constructed without a permit or prior inspection. During final review, the building inspector required an engineer-stamped foundation certification letter verifying that the slab foundation was adequate and compliant with applicable code requirements in order to approve the permit. 🧠 Engineering Scope Provided Oasis Engineering was retained to perform an existing foundation verification and certification, limited to evaluation of the slab supporting a residential accessory structure. No new foundation design, detailing, or engineered drawings were included in this scope as the owner already had plans and permits. 🔍 Field Verification Process During the site visit, our engineer: All verification methods were non-destructive, appropriate for existing construction, and consistent with professional engineering practice for after-the-fact evaluations. ✅ Outcome Based on the field verification and submitted documentation: 🛠️ Key Takeaway After-the-fact foundation issues do not automatically require demolition, replacement, or redesign. With proper engineering review, documentation, and verification, many existing slabs can be evaluated and, when appropriate, certified to meet applicable code requirements—allowing projects to move forward efficiently and responsibly. ⚡ How This Case Study Connects to Our Services This project illustrates the two primary ways Oasis Engineering assists homeowners and contractors with existing slab foundation certification. Option 1 — Engineer Site Visit Best suited for: ✔ Typical cost: $500–$700 (depending on location).✔ Includes on-site verification and engineer-stamped certification letter (if compliant) Option 2 — DIY Concrete Slab Verification Kit Best suited for: ✔ Engineer-reviewed submissions✔ Same certification letter issued only if standards are met✔ $199 kit, creditable toward a full site visit if needed This option utilizes homeowner-collected documentation reviewed by a licensed professional engineer. Final certification is issued solely at the engineer’s discretion and only when submitted data confirms compliance with applicable code requirements.

After-the-Fact Foundation Certification for Existing Metal Building Read More »

Boulder Wind Engineering

Navigating Boulder’s Building Codes: A Complete Engineering Guide for Your Project

Navigating Boulder’s Building Codes: A Complete Engineering Guide for Your Project Building in Boulder, Colorado, offers the rare opportunity to create structures amidst one of the nation’s most stunning natural landscapes. This allure, however, is matched by a unique set of challenges. The region’s progressive ethos is reflected in a complex and forward-thinking regulatory environment, while its position at the foot of the Rocky Mountains subjects projects to some of the most demanding environmental forces in the country, chief among them being severe wind events. For architects, builders, and homeowners, navigating the building permit and design process can be a daunting task, filled with jurisdictional nuances, hyper-specific code amendments, and stringent structural requirements. A misstep in this landscape can lead to costly project delays, extensive redesigns, or, in the worst-case scenario, structural failure. This guide serves as a comprehensive roadmap to demystify this process, highlighting the critical engineering requirements necessary for project approval in the Boulder area. Understanding these rules—especially those related to wind engineering—is not merely a matter of compliance; it is fundamental to ensuring the long-term safety, resilience, and value of any structure built on the Front Range. By delving into the specifics of local codes, this report provides a clear path to a successful and secure build. The Lay of the Land: Understanding Boulder’s Jurisdictional Labyrinth The most critical and foundational concept for any Boulder-area project is that the rules are not monolithic. A common and costly error is applying the wrong set of codes, an issue that can be avoided by first understanding the local regulatory geography. City vs. County – A Tale of Two Building Departments Any construction project in the Boulder area is governed by one of two distinct entities: the City of Boulder Planning & Development Services for projects within city limits, or the Boulder County Community Planning & Permitting Department for projects in unincorporated areas.1 These are separate organizations with their own administrative staff, websites, online application portals, and, most importantly, their own unique building code amendments.3 The County’s jurisdiction explicitly covers unincorporated Boulder County, while municipalities like the City of Boulder adopt and enforce their own codes.2 The failure to correctly identify a project’s governing jurisdiction is the most fundamental error a project team can make, with ripple effects that can invalidate an entire set of construction documents. For example, the City of Boulder specifies design wind speeds in a table within its municipal code, differentiating between properties east and west of Broadway.4 In contrast, Boulder County uses a detailed wind speed map that provides site-specific values.5 Using the wrong source for this single critical parameter would render all subsequent structural calculations incorrect. Therefore, the first step to compliance, before any other planning or design work begins, must be a definitive address check to confirm which building department has authority over the property. A Moving Target: Keeping Pace with Code Adoption Cycles Building codes are not static; they evolve to incorporate new research, materials, and safety standards. Both the City and County periodically adopt newer versions of the International Codes—such as the International Building Code (IBC) and International Residential Code (IRC)—along with a suite of local amendments. The design requirements for any given project are determined by its permit application submittal date.6 This creates a dynamic regulatory environment. As of 2025, both jurisdictions have undergone recent, significant updates: The staggered and recent nature of these code adoption cycles creates a significant “compliance gap” risk, particularly for projects with long design and planning phases. A complex custom home or commercial building may have a design phase lasting many months. A project team that begins work assuming the applicability of a current code could find its plans non-compliant if the permit application is delayed past the effective date for a new code cycle. This would necessitate significant and costly revisions to structural, energy, and life-safety systems to meet the newer, often more stringent, standards. Proactive engagement with these timelines is essential to future-proof a design and avoid unforeseen expenses. The Force of Nature: Mastering Boulder’s Wind Engineering Requirements Boulder’s location at the transition between the Great Plains and the Rocky Mountains creates unique meteorological conditions, including powerful downslope windstorms. In recognition of this, local codes designate the area as a “Special Wind Region,” making robust wind engineering a primary driver of structural design and a non-negotiable aspect of public safety.8 The Ultimate Design Wind Speed (Vult​): A Tale of Two Maps The foundation of any wind load calculation is the ultimate design wind speed, or Vult​. This value is determined differently depending on the project’s jurisdiction. The following table summarizes the primary wind speed criteria for the area. Jurisdiction Risk Category I Risk Category II Risk Category III & IV City of Boulder – East of Broadway 140 mph 150 mph 160 mph City of Boulder – West of Broadway 155 mph 165 mph 175 mph Unincorporated Boulder County Refer to Map Refer to Map Refer to Map Data derived from Boulder Revised Code 10-5-2 4 and Boulder County Wind Speed Map.5 The ASCE 7 Standard and the Topographic Factor (Kzt​) Anomaly The American Society of Civil Engineers’ standard, Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE 7), is the nationally recognized methodology for calculating wind pressures.8 A key component of this standard is the Topographic Factor, Kzt​. This factor is a multiplier used in the velocity pressure equation, $q_z = 0.00256 K_z K_{zt} K_e V^2$, that accounts for the acceleration of wind as it flows over abrupt changes in terrain like hills, ridges, and escarpments.11 Per ASCE 7, this factor must be considered when a structure is located in the upper half of a hill or near a crest, and the terrain meets specific geometric criteria, such as a height-to-length ratio ( H/Lh​) of at least 0.2.11 The formula for Kzt​ is $K_{zt} = (1+K_1K_2K_3)^2$.12 Given Boulder’s hilly and mountainous terrain, the application of Kzt​ would seem universal. However, a critical and nuanced distinction exists between the

Navigating Boulder’s Building Codes: A Complete Engineering Guide for Your Project Read More »

Foundation Engineer Texas

🏗️ Foundation Engineering Letters in Dallas: What You Need to Know (IRC Chapter 4 + Texas Requirements)

🏗️ Foundation Engineering Letters in Dallas: What You Need to Know (IRC Chapter 4 + Texas Requirements) When building or remodeling in Dallas or other parts of Texas, it’s common for city inspectors or homeowners to request a foundation letter from a licensed structural engineer. But what does this mean — and how is it different from what you’d need in a state like Florida? At Oasis Engineering, we frequently handle these requests across Texas, and we’re breaking down the key details you need to know to stay compliant with the 2021 IRC, local building departments, and engineering best practices. 📘 What Does IRC Chapter 4 Say About Foundations? Chapter 4 of the International Residential Code (IRC) governs all things foundation — including footings, piers, stem walls, and more. It ensures your foundation can: The key section for Dallas and Texas is: IRC R401.2:“Foundation construction shall be capable of accommodating all loads in accordance with Section R301 and of transmitting the resulting loads to the supporting soil…” In Texas, every foundation or any addition to a foundation must be sealed by a licensed engineer per state law. 🏠 Common Foundation Letter Requests in Dallas In Dallas, we typically receive foundation letter requests for: Unlike Florida, where a full set of sealed structural drawings is almost always required for any permit, Texas allows more flexibility. An engineer letter is often enough to satisfy the city — but it must be based on engineering calculations and site-specific information (design parameters, photos, spacing, pier count, etc.). 📏 What’s Included in a Foundation Certification Letter? A typical Oasis Engineering foundation letter includes: 📍 Dallas-Specific Notes ✍️ When You Need a Texas PE Stamp Even with flexible requirements, any structural certification or analysis in Texas must be sealed by a PE (Professional Engineer) licensed in the state. Oasis Engineering holds an active Texas PE license and regularly provides letters for DFW cities including: 🧠 Bottom Line: More Flexibility, Still Needs Engineering If you’re building a home addition, modifying piers, or replacing framing over an existing crawl space — chances are your city inspector or plan reviewer will ask for a foundation engineer letter. In Texas, this doesn’t always mean a full set of structural plans — but it does require a licensed engineer’s stamp and confirmation that your foundation is safe, stable, and code-compliant. ✅ Need a Foundation Letter Fast? We can usually turn these around in 1–3 business days with photos, a sketch, and key dimensions. Just send us: 📩 Ready to get started?Reach out at OasisEngineering.com/contact. We’ll get you a certified letter, stamped by a Texas PE, with code references and engineering calculations to back it up.

🏗️ Foundation Engineering Letters in Dallas: What You Need to Know (IRC Chapter 4 + Texas Requirements) Read More »

🏛️ New Florida Law Speeds Up Permits: What HB 683 & HB 1035 Mean for Engineer Letters and Wind Calculations (Effective July 1, 2025)

🏛️ New Florida Law Speeds Up Permits: What HB 683 & HB 1035 Mean for Engineer Letters and Wind Calculations (Effective July 1, 2025) Florida contractors, engineers, and homeowners just got a major permitting win. As of July 1, 2025, two new laws—HB 683 and HB 1035—are officially in effect, transforming how building permits are reviewed, processed, and enforced statewide. Whether you’re pulling permits for a container home, a residential addition, or submitting a signed engineer letter for wind calculations, this guide explains what’s changed and how it affects you. ✅ Summary of New Florida Permitting Law Changes 1. Contracts No Longer Required with Permit Applications Local jurisdictions cannot require pricing, contracts, or contingency terms to be included in a permit application. This is critical for: Protecting proprietary contractor and owner agreements Reducing administrative burden on engineer-submitted packages Tip: When submitting an engineer letter or wind load analysis, make sure your documents are code-compliant—but leave out private contract details unless specifically required by statute. 2. Mandatory Permit Review Timelines Florida now has fixed deadlines based on project size: Use Case: If you’re submitting engineered wind calcs for a rooftop solar install or HVHZ compliance letters, the reviewing agency must now respond faster—or risk triggering automatic approvals or legal obligations. 3. Engineer Letters and Wind Calculations Get Fast-Tracked For low-risk, single-trade scopes like: Solar panel installation Residential windows and doors Alarm systems or plumbing You may now use private providers, third-party inspectors, or virtual inspections to satisfy permitting and compliance faster—particularly helpful when paired with: Wind calculation letters Structural load analysis HVHZ engineer compliance documentation ✍️ How This Impacts Engineer Letters If you’re an engineer or contractor submitting: Structural letters for code compliance Wind calculation packages HVHZ or ASCE 7 design documentation These laws directly improve turnaround times, reduce government red tape, and protect your deliverables from being delayed over unrelated paperwork. ⚠️ Change Orders Are Now Enforceable Local agencies must respond to change order pricing within 30 days. If they don’t—and fail to justify a denial in writing—they may be held financially responsible for: Material and labor costs Overhead and schedule impact This gives engineers and GCs stronger leverage when conditions change mid-project and new documentation (such as revised plans or letters) must be submitted. 📌 Final Thoughts The July 1, 2025 changes to Florida’s permitting laws are a major win for professionals who rely on: Accurate engineer letters for code compliance Timely wind calculations and structural load designs Faster permit approvals for residential and light commercial construction Need an Engineer Letter or Wind Calculation for Florida Permits? At Oasis Engineering, we provide: Stamped engineer letters for permitting across all Florida counties ASCE 7-16 compliant wind load calculations for roofs, walls, and fenestration Fast turnarounds and HVHZ-ready reports Visit https://oasisengineering.com/engineer-letters or https://windcalculations.com to get started.

🏛️ New Florida Law Speeds Up Permits: What HB 683 & HB 1035 Mean for Engineer Letters and Wind Calculations (Effective July 1, 2025) Read More »

Baby Boxabl, Source: https://www.boxabl.com/baby-box

🏗️ Boxabl Foundation Engineering: What You Need and What We Provide

🏗️ Boxabl Foundation Engineering: What You Need and What We Provide If you’re planning to install a Boxabl Casita on your property, you’ve probably noticed that getting the unit is just one part of the equation. Before you can move in or get approval to build, you’ll need something crucial: 👉 Stamped structural engineering plans for your foundation. That’s where we come in. 💼 Our Role in Your Boxabl Project We do not sell or build Boxabl homes.Instead, we provide the engineering services needed to get your Boxabl unit legally permitted and installed. Oasis Engineering LLC offers professional, PE-stamped foundation plans tailored to your property and local code requirements. We’ve helped hundreds of clients across the U.S. get their Boxabl homes permitted and built on solid ground. Learn more about our dedicated service here:🔗 BoxablFoundations.com 📄 What’s Included in Our Engineering Packages We specialize in stamped drawings and structural support documentation required for permitting. Every city and county is different, but most projects require: Service Description Stamped Foundation Plan Permit-ready drawings stamped by a licensed engineer (PE) Wind & Seismic Calculations Based on your exact site and local code zone Slab, Pier, or Crawlspace Design Customized to your site and soil conditions Anchor Bolt / Slab Layouts Ensures proper Boxabl install Site-Specific Modifications If your site has slopes, setbacks, or custom needs We’re known for fast turnaround, straightforward pricing, and clean permit-ready plans. 📜 Manufactured Home Foundation Certifications Some states and lenders consider Boxabl units “manufactured homes” and require a HUD-style Foundation Certification Letter. We offer this service as well. If you’re working with a lender or a building department that requests this documentation, visit:🔗 Manufactured Home Foundation Letters → Fast Turnaround Service. 🌎 Areas We Serve We are licensed in multiple high-demand states, including: And we’re expanding. If you’re not on this list, contact us — we may still be able to help. ❌ What We Don’t Do (Just So We’re Clear) We’re not Boxabl. We’re not contractors. Here’s what we don’t do: We’re engineers. We design the foundation and give you the stamped plans to get your permit. ✅ Ready to Start? If you’ve already purchased a Boxabl unit — or are in the process — we can help you move forward with permitting. Get your quote today:📩 oasisengineering.com/contact Or explore our Boxabl-specific resource site:🔗 BoxablFoundations.com Oasis Engineering LLCTrusted by homeowners, builders, and Boxabl buyers nationwide.813-694-8989 | info@oasisengineering.com

🏗️ Boxabl Foundation Engineering: What You Need and What We Provide Read More »

Pool Bonding Sketch

🛠️ Why Electrical Bonding Around Pools Is Critical — And What the Code Requires

🛠️ Why Electrical Bonding Around Pools Is Critical — And What the Code Requires When it comes to backyard pools, safety doesn’t stop with fencing and slip-resistant decks. One of the most critical life-safety measures—and often the least understood—is electrical bonding. Whether you’re building a new pool, adding a lanai, or pouring footings near an existing shell, failing to properly bond nearby metal components can result in dangerous voltage differences, putting swimmers and contractors at risk of electric shock. Let’s break down why bonding matters, where it’s required, and what the Florida Building Code (FBC) and National Electrical Code (NEC) say about it. ⚡ What Is Equipotential Bonding? Equipotential bonding ensures that all conductive components near a pool—whether they carry electricity or not—are electrically connected together. The goal is to equalize voltage potential so that people in contact with water and nearby metal do not become part of a circuit. 📍 Where Is Bonding Required? Per the Florida Building Code Residential (FBC-R 2023, 8th Edition) and NEC 2020, Section 680.26, bonding is required for the following: 🔗 1. Pool Reinforcement Steel and Shells Code Reference: FBC-R E4204.2 / NEC 680.26(B)(1)Rebar in concrete shells must be bonded together with tie wire or a copper grid. Shells made of cast-in-place or sprayed concrete are considered conductive. 🧱 2. Perimeter Surfaces Code Reference: FBC-R E4204.2 / NEC 680.26(B)(2)Any surface within 3 feet horizontally from the pool wall, and between 3 feet above and 2 feet below the water level, must be bonded. This includes: 🔧 These surfaces must connect to the pool bonding grid at a minimum of four (4) points, or continuously around the perimeter. 🏗️ 3. Fixed Metal Components Within 5 Feet Code Reference: NEC 680.26(B)(7)Any fixed metal part within 5 feet horizontally or 12 feet vertically of the pool water must be bonded. This includes: Even if these items aren’t part of the pool system, their proximity makes them dangerous without bonding. 💡 4. Electrical Equipment Code Reference: NEC 680.26(B)(6)Bonding is required for: 🧰 How Is Bonding Installed? All bonded parts must be connected using: ✅ Field Note: Bonding for Column Footings Near Pools At Oasis Engineering, we often inspect lanai columns or structural footings poured within 5 feet of a pool. These must include a bonded rebar or anchor point tied into the equipotential system—even if not part of the pool structure. We provide engineering letters per FBC Section 110 to support after-the-fact inspection approval when needed. 🚨 Why It Matters Failing to bond properly can result in: 📜 Key Code References 🧠 Final Word Electrical bonding isn’t just about code compliance—it’s about protecting lives. Whether you’re a builder, homeowner, or inspector, make sure bonding is part of your pool project from day one. Need an engineering letter or field inspection for a poured footing near a pool? We can help.📞 Contact us today or book a virtual consult. Want to learn more? Refer to this equipotential bonding diagram on UpCodes, which helps visualize bonding locations around a swimming pool per FBC R4501.17 / NEC 680.26.

🛠️ Why Electrical Bonding Around Pools Is Critical — And What the Code Requires Read More »

mobile home letter

Manufactured Home Foundation Engineer Letters

Manufactured Home Foundation Engineer Letters Understanding the Role of Engineering Certifications in Mortgage Compliance Why Real Property Classification Matters When it comes to manufactured housing, there is a fundamental distinction between personal property and real property—and this classification has significant implications for appraisals, lending, and title conversion. A manufactured home placed on land without a permanent foundation is typically considered personal property, similar to a vehicle. It may be titled separately from the land and financed differently, often with less favorable terms. However, once the home is permanently affixed to a foundation that meets HUD or other code requirements, it can be legally converted into real property—meaning it is treated the same as a traditional site-built home. This reclassification is what allows the home to: This transition from personal to real property is not automatic. It typically requires documentation, inspections, and in most cases, a foundation certification letter from a licensed professional engineer. The Appraisal Angle: Cost vs. Market Value Appraisers and underwriters often request the Cost Approach as part of their loan package—especially for new or recently installed manufactured homes. It is not uncommon for the new purchase cost (or build cost) of a manufactured home to be lower than the final appraised market value once installed. This is due to the added value of land improvements, including: This increase in value is only recognized if the property is properly classified as real property. The foundation engineer letter becomes a critical document in this process—it confirms that the home is installed according to HUD’s Permanent Foundations Guide for Manufactured Housing (PFGMH) and applicable local codes. What Is a Foundation Engineer Letter? A Manufactured Home Foundation Certification Letter is a formal document prepared by a licensed professional engineer (PE). It certifies that the foundation system complies with: This certification is often required by: Without this certification, the mortgage process may be delayed—or the property may not qualify for real property financing at all. Our Process At Oasis Engineering, we provide turnkey certification services for manufactured homes across the U.S. Our process includes: We also offer expedited service options when timing is critical for closings or underwriting deadlines. When to Request This Letter Learn More Visit: https://oasisengineering.com/manufactured-home-foundation-letter/ Includes detailed FAQ, video walkthrough, and intake form for service requests.

Manufactured Home Foundation Engineer Letters Read More »